Jonathan LaCour wrote: > Ilias Lazaridis wrote: [...] > > b) a simple confirmation of my conclusion: > > > >>> SQLAlchemy (DataMapper) can implement SQLObject (Active Record) > >>> SQLObject (Active Record) cannot implement SQLAlchemy (DataMapper) > > Your conclusion is misguided because you don't have any understanding [...] > then I suggest that you stop trying to interpret people's words.
peoples words: "SQLAlchemy implements the Data Mapper pattern, of which the Active Record pattern (which SQLObject implements) is a subset." please notice: "subset". My conclusion is of course correct, and is based on the meaning of the term "subset". So, possibly "peoples words" were wrong. - Overcomplicating issues, in order to not let people understand is very simple. Simplifying the issues, in order to let people understand - that's the real difficulty. Sadly, I've currently not the time to further look at the persistency case. http://case.lazaridis.com/wiki/Persist Just wondering more and more about "A Dynamic Language, Without a Dynamic ORM" (Python). Seems like Zope DB and Durus are the only dynamic solutions for python. The ORM league has (till now) failed to produce an dynamic OO layer on top of Relational databases. . > -- > Jonathan LaCour > http://cleverdevil.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
