On Jan 15, 2007, at 12:05 PM, Manlio Perillo wrote:
My idea is simple.
1) When the database does not support schema, the schema name
specified
in Table costructor should be prepended to the table name.
foo = Table('foo', ..., schema='bar')
result in a table named bar_foo
why not just name your table "bar_foo" ? why have two ways to do the
same thing ? how would this work with autoloading ? why make a
keyword argument called "schema" do something that is nothing like a
what a "schema" actually is ?
2) If the database is SQLite, the schema name should be used to
create a
new database, attaching it to the main database.
engine = create_engine('sqlite://db')
foo = Table('foo', ..., schema='bar')
result in a new database named db_bar.
why not just conenct to a database file called "db_bar"? why have
two ways to do the same thing ? why make a keyword argument called
"schema" do something that is nothing like a what a "schema" actually
is ?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sqlalchemy" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
