i mentioned this dictionary-order on my ramblings some weeks ago; then
u didnt take it into account.
i've managed here to get repeatable testing and SQL generation with
hack-replacing many {} with ordered ones, but i don't like the
solution.
Why not just use util.Dict (defaulting to dict) instead of {}?
Then whoever wants, replaces that with Ordered one and voila, all
things get repeatable, if a little slower.
> assuming this is ticket 461 which has been fixed and some extra
> testing options added to catch these better.
>
> if youre wondering about "random" its because there is more than
> one way to produce a "topological sort" for many partial
> orderings...so when the initial "A is dependent on B, B is
> dependent on C" information sent to the sorter is incorrect as it
> was here, it will produce errors only if the resulting sort happens
> to turn out in an certain way, which is generally based on python's
> dictionary ordering for that particular run. things like -OO and
> such will change the ordering you get from dicts.
>
> as far as "blocking", its definitely not time to use SA in any kind
> of avionics or medical devices...id wait another 25 years for that.
>
> On Feb 6, 6:37 am, "sagblmi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > When I run the testsuite more than once, results are differents.
> > This strange behavior disappear when the the testsuite is
> > launched with python in optimize mode 'python -OO alltest.py'
> > This is particularly true with orm.inheritance5.
> >
> > Very very strange and very blocking since we can't guarantee the
> > result.
> >
> > Any idee?
>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sqlalchemy" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
