#476 - forget the visitor stuff; i use the simpler code that is in the text of "02/15/07 09:59:22 changed by svil" comment, for some 2 months now, and all is ok. i've added the patch/code to that ticket as well as to #474/475.
On Friday 13 April 2007 23:17:37 Ants Aasma wrote: > On Apr 13, 10:16 pm, Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > OK, first thing i wasnt sure about, is CASE supported on every DB > > that we support. I took a look at our CASE unit test and it > > appears it applies to all DBs...(although i cant verify it passes > > on firebird). > > Works on Firebird 1.5.3. I haven't verified older MySQL and > PostreSQL releases, but I'll try to verify those too, or at least > check changelogs for related changes. > > > really, the work to do here is 5% the patch to the in_() method, > > and 95% making me a really nice unit test suite that will > > generatively test IN for every contingency....including the bind > > param stuff in #476 (but simpler code than whats patched there). > > otherwise its giong to sit in the queue for awhile since i still > > have a lot of other more pressing patches i havent yet had the > > time to test/apply. > > I'll try to create a test suite for it next week, I have already > identified most of the test cases. Should I attach it to #476 or > create a new ticket? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
