On 6/6/07, Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> just to note, I am leaning towards very simple generative method
> names for all the things we need, where(), having(), order_by(),
> group_by(), distinct(), etc. I am going to have it do "copy on
> generate" by default.
If a generative default can be efficient, it would avoid the dilemma
of "Generative or not?", while also being parallel with Query.
Otherwise, returning 'self' would be fine, and I promise to look the
other way. :) Then I could do:
q.order_by(...)
instead of
q = q.order_by(...)
While those who prefer the latter can do that, and if you really need a copy:
q = q.clone().order_by(...)
Keep in mind that modifying the query is much more frequent than copying it.
--
Mike Orr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sqlalchemy" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
