hi gang - seems like I am getting a grip on whats really going to be different and such in 0.4. I think it would be a good idea for me to put out there some of the things i want to remove, as well as a few notable backwards-incompatible changes, just to give a heads up. Note that this list is only things that youll *have* to do in order to use 0.4...im not including things that are deprecated but will still work throughout 0.4.
1. import structure The biggest thing, and im not sure if people are ready for this one, is separating "sqlalchemy" from "sqlalchemy.orm". Its been the case for a long time that you can do your imports like this: from sqlalchemy import * from sqlalchemy.orm import * and obviously you can import the specific classes explicitly, i.e. from sqlalchemy import Table, Column from sqlalchemy.orm import mapper, relation, backref in 0.4, "sqlalchemy" is no longer going to pull in the whole list of "sqlalchemy.orm" into its namespace. this means, to use mappers, you *have* to import from the "sqlalchemy.orm" package explicitly as above. this is partially to raise awareness of the fact that there is a pretty strict separation between the two packages, and to encourage better organization of concerns. so that means if you use mapper(), relation(), backref(), create_session(), eagerload()/ lazyload(), you have to import them from sqlalchemy.orm. this upcoming change has been mentioned on the tutorial page for several months now too. what the frameworks and such can do *right now*, is to start importing as appropriate from 'sqlalchemy.orm' for object-relational functionality. that way this wont present an issue with an 0.4 upgrade. like i mentioned, if theres really some severe issue with this, we can perhaps come up with a hack to "backfill" 'sqlalchemy.orm' into 'sqlalchemy' for some software package that cant be updated, but i really want to try to get just this one little cleanup of concerns out there. 2. assignmapper query methods The next biggest thing is assignmapper. OK, im not taking assignmapper away. But I am going to change the interface. All querying will be available off of a single attribute, "query". most likely the parenthesis (i.e. class.query()) will not be needed. so: MyClass.query.filter_by(street='123 green street').all() this is because we cant just keep putting every single method from Query on the mapped class. plus with Query being generative, it makes even less sense for any of the methods to be off of the class directly. id like to just take all the other select(), select_by() methods off of it, because i really want people to stop using them. you can start using MyClass.query() right now, which will still work with the parens in 0.4, and in 0.3.9 ill try to get MyClass.query.<foo> to work as well so you can be totally forwards compatible with 0.3.9. 3. assignmapper myobject.flush() this is the other thing I really want to get rid of on assignmapper. this is the most overused and anti-patternish thing out there. it doesnt predictably handle the things attached to it (which is not for any strong technical reason, just that its a complicated case which id rather not have to bother with), and it works against the kinds of patterns the Session is intended to be used for. you still can flush an individual or group of instances, which is valid in certain cases, by calling session.flush([<objects>])...but that ensures that you really mean to do that. 4. global_connect() / default_metadata as well as the ability to say "Table('sometable', Column(...)...)" etc without using any MetaData. This one i know is going to raise some ire. But I look at it this way: someday, Guido is going to take a look at SQLAlchemy, and when that day comes, i dont want there to be a trace that this ugly thing ever existed...it screams "SA cant decide how its API should look". Plus it used DynamicMetaData which is a totally misunderstood object that isnt going away but will be much more downplayed. youre responsible for your own MetaData object and telling your Table objects about it. 5. clear_mapper() note this is *not* clear_mappers(), which is a pretty important function. this one, the ability to clear just *one* mapper, is going away..because this capability never really existed anyway. the total set of mappers for your application organize themselves into their own symbiotic ecosystem....splicing just one from out of it is a configurational game of jenga you'll never win. i dont think this was a very commonly used function. Taking more of a stroll down memory lane, see if you remember these tunes: 6. cascade_mappers() If you've been around long enough to know what this one does, I commend you. but if you've then not been paying attention enough to know that i hate this function, shame on you ! this thing just sucks. folks are free to copy it into their own library of mediocre functions if they actually use it for something. 7. query.select_by_whatever('something') yeah, back when we thought ActiveRecord was cool. or at least someone told me it was. anyway, i dont think this one is too common. 8. table.select().execute(col1=5, col2=7) == "SELECT * FROM TABLE WHERE col1=5 AND col2=7". I am fairly certain that nobody knows what i am talking about here since this one was never documented. If you think its cool, too bad you missed the past 2 years to enjoy this doomed trick. 9. ProxyEngine This is a feature that I *like*, its just that it hasnt worked for about 18 months. The ProxyEngine *will* be back at some later date, in a new form, but for now its offline. 10. SelectResults (sort of) if youre using SelectResults, it will still import and act *mostly* the same as it used to...but its just a placeholder now that does almost nothing, since the Query has all of its functionality. so the behavior of join() changes slightly (see #13 below). 11. everything in sqlalchemy.mods I just realized theres nothing in here we should be keeping. This would include "sqlalchemy.mods.threadlocal", which is evil, and the never used "legacy_session" and "selectresults" mods. selectresults mod is particularly unneeded becuase like in 10, all of SelectResults is on Query now. Next up are some things that are not going away but are going to change backwards-incompatibly: 12. select.order_by() and select.group_by() (i.e. on the SQL select() construct) are going to be generative, i.e. they return a new select object. the old behavior will be present in select.append_order_by() and select.append_group_by() (yes, I decided to keep both generative and in-place APIs for this. but we're going to push the generative API and leave the "append_" versions just in docstrings). 13. also slightly backwards incompatible: session.query(A).join ('b').join('c') in 0.3 produces "select * from a join b on a.id=b.id join c on b.id=c.id". in 0.4, both 'b' and 'c' will be interpreted as attributes on 'A', as in "select * from a join b on a.id=b.id join c on a.id=c.id". to get a join from A->b->c, do session.query(A).join (['b', 'c']). this new way allows you to re-join from the root as often as you like. if you need totally custom joins, use query.select_from(<custom join objects>). there is also a cool "aliased" version of joins you can do in query.filter_by(). 14. on the subject of filter_by(), filter_by(*clauseelements, **kwargs) becomes just filter_by(**kwargs). you put the Table/ Column expressions in a filter() call. the deprecated select_by()/ count_by()/etc. will still be there and will allow the old style. 15. custom dictionary collections are now much more powerful at the expense of being slightly more finicky (i.e. collection_class=MyDict). quickest way to make your custom dictionary class compatible is to either subclass dict, or add the mixin class sqlalchemy.orm.collections.MappedCollection (i.e. class MyDict(MappedCollection):). the __iter__() method goes back to normal (returns keys) and you also need to implement a remove() method. We'll see if we can produce a forwards compatible emulation of this in 0.3.9. ...and there you have it, all I can think of for now. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---