Michael Bayer wrote: > both of your before_update() functions return EXT_PASS. theyll both be > called.
Well, yeah. I just found it a little bit odd that I had to do this. When I saw EXT_PASS, I didn't think it meant "continue along with other mapper extensions." It seems like a bad idea for one mapper extension to be able to inject itself into the front of the extensions list and then cause all other mapper extensions to not execute by returning something other than EXT_PASS. So, I guess it was less of a problem, and more of me raising a point of confusion and wondering if that part of the API couldn't be smoothed out a bit :) -- Jonathan LaCour http://cleverdevil.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
