and no need for that __new__ replacement either - just use _list_decorators._funcs instead of _list_decorators()
On Monday 20 August 2007 17:05:32 svilen wrote: > a patch, it got even tidier ;-) - > no more _tidy() calls, all automated. > > On Monday 20 August 2007 16:41:30 svilen wrote: > > a suggestion about _list_decorators() and similar. > > they can be easily made into classes, i.e. non dynamic (and > > overloadable/patchable :-). > > > > class _list_decorators( object): --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
