On Sep 19, 2007, at 12:01 PM, Marcin Kasperski wrote:
> > > Well, I tried: > > select( [... some things ... ], > from_obj = table1.outerjoin(table2, table1.fgn_key = > table2.key) ) > > and got very unfriendly: > > iteration over non-sequence > > message. Adding [ ] helped, the clause below is OK: > > select( [... some things ... ], > from_obj = [ table1.outerjoin(table2, table1.fgn_key = > table2.key) ] ) > > but ... wouldn't it make sense to add this if in from_obj parameter > handling? Even in SQLAlchemy docs most cases where from_obj is used > refer to single value... yes, probably as a scalar would be convenient. if you add a trac ticket that would be helpful. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
