On Oct 11, 2:21 pm, "Paul Johnston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW, with SA 0.4, this script should be able to work with no
> database-specific hacks at all. If you're interesting in implementing this,
> I can explain more.
Would be nice to hear more details about this.
Currently I'm stuck to 0.3.10 for my projects and so I will support
0.3.10 with the 0.4.x line of autocode.
I will open a branch for the 0.5 version that will have sqlalchemy
0.4.x support.
That does not mean that I will not work on the 0.5 branch it does mean
that I will more actively support 0.4.x but patches and ideas for 0.5
are welcome! If all goes well 0.5 can be released with the first
stable version of sqlalchemy 0.4.
Simon
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sqlalchemy" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
