On Oct 30, 2007, at 5:41 AM, Felix Schwarz wrote:
>
> foo = session.query(User).filter_by(name='Foo Bar').one()
> session.save(foo)
>
> for address in foo.addresses:
> foo.addresses.remove(address)
> session.delete(address)
> session.delete(foo)
>
> foo = User()
> session.save(foo)
> foo.id = 1
> foo_addr = Address()
> session.save(foo_addr)
> foo_addr.street = "Picadelly Circus"
> foo.addresses.append(foo_addr)
>
> transaction.commit()
specifically its the "foo.id=1" thats causing it to fail. by setting
it, you trigger a special rule in SQLAlchemy designed to deal with
this, called a "row switch", where it converts your DELETE and INSERT
into a single UPDATE. apparently the cascade onto the related
addresses collection is getting confused; ticket 841 is added.
additionally, your session.save(foo) right below the query is also
incorrect (though does not affect the test), ive added ticket 840 to
ensure an exception is raised there.
if you truly need to "row switch", i.e. your second User needs to
have the same id #1, issue a flush after the deletion of the previous
user:
for address in foo.addresses:
foo.addresses.remove(address)
session.delete(address)
session.flush()
that will remove the previous address rows from the database before
getting into the newly added user.
also the removal of the addresses there could be automated by just
placing "cascade='all,delete-orphan'" on the User.addresses relation.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sqlalchemy" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
