On Dec 19, 2007, at 9:03 PM, Lele Gaifax wrote:

> Yes, in fact. As said, `supports_sane_multi_rowcount` should stay to
> False, while I'm arguing about the other, `supports_sane_rowcount`
> also currently set to False under FB (IIRC, you switched both to False
> in a single patch a few months ago), but which I'm unable to notice
> any difference in test results changing its setting.

yeah this is all up to you guys, whatever you agree works with a  
reasonable range of FB versions is fine with me.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sqlalchemy" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to