Thanks for the quick reply! I've always been quite impressed with the quality of SA and its support.
I'm a bit swamped at work at the moment but I'll see about putting a 'CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE' patch together. MZ On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > that's pretty good you came up with that. We haven't placed explicit > support for multiple items as the subject of an IN statement. You can > do what you have there without _Grouping by saying > ClauseList(...).self_group(). I think you're safe with that for now > though we should add a "public" function for this purpose at some point. > > > > if its just a matter of saying "CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE" instead of > "CREATE TABLE", we can accept a patch for "temporary=True", sure. > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
