Is the stuff from user_defined_state branch merge in ? If so is the __sa_instrument_class__ stuff the same ?
Michael Bayer wrote: > hey list - > > as you might have noticed we've merged 0.5 into the trunk. this > version is already spectacular and I encourage everyone to start > poking around. > > The migration doc is being developed at > http://www.sqlalchemy.org/trac/wiki/05Migration > . The emphasis in this release is two big new paradigm shifts (i'll > leave what those are as an exercise for the reader), honing in on a > particular set of defaults for things (i.e. sessions), and otherwise > locking down lots of APIs that were in a previously wiggly or > otherwise deprecated state. > > Two controversies to settle are: > > - Python 2.3. We'd *really* like to get off of it as it holds us > back from working more nicely with 2.6 as well as the 2to3 tool. > - Unicode. Consideration of going further into being > "unicode everywhere", which may or may not impact end-user code (i.e. > if you use String, you need to send u'hello' for data) > > For access to the current trunk of 0.4, we're back on the 0.4 branch: > > http://svn.sqlalchemy.org/sqlalchemy/branches/rel_0_4 > > Next release of 0.4 is 0.4.6 which should be out soon. > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
