On Jul 19, 2008, at 7:39 AM, Malthe Borch wrote:
> I tried adapting your example, which admittedly works :-), to a > scenario > that better resembles mine, but now the property is overriden simply, > even when I use ``exclude_properties``. > > Note that the setup is overly complex, but this should be seen in the > light of a larger setup (as you've previously guided me towards, > incidentally). > well, i can support this in 0.5 trunk. in rev 4965, If a descriptor is present on a class, or if the name is excluded via the include/ exclude lists, the attribute will not be instrumented via the inherited mapper or via the mapped Table. So your example works with just the @property alone. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
