Thanks I'll go ahead and do that.
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > > On Sep 19, 2008, at 1:24 PM, Sam Widmer wrote: > > > Thanks for the responses so far. > > > > The reason we tried pymssql is because it is much easier to get > > running on OSX. At the moment our efforts to get pyodbc working on > > Macs have met with alot of frustration. > > > > However, we would have done things differently if we had seen > > different wording in the SqlAlchemy docs. For instance, a notice > > that binary fields do not work with pymssql. This would have put us > > down the pyodbc path right away. Instead, I found the non-specific > > statement in the MSSQL Known Issues section. I then searched for > > what those issues were and found plenty of Unicode Type issues but > > nothing really relating to Binary types. > > > > So, with all the above in mind we are proceeding down the pyodbc path. > > > > For the project, I am not asking for any work to be done on pymssql > > but rather that the Known Issues section be clarified to state that > > Binary Types do not work. > > the quickest path here would be for you to edit the wiki directly - > log in as "guest/guest". We put the database issues there > specfically so it could be a collaborative document drawing upon the > communities' experience directly. > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
