hi. can i hook somewhere around implicit associative collections (secondary_table=...), so i can influence somehow the row being inserted? e.g. i have column "disabled" in the secondarytable, and it has to be populated at runtime... something like someX.items.append( y, disabled=True) meaning there is link but it is disabled.
one possibility i see is to have a functor as column's default_value and somehow "convince" it to put the proper value into it... or maybe it's not possible, thinking of the sequences of SA... i guess inserting the row is very-very late. is explicit assoc_object the only real possibility? i'm half way there, having a semi-explicit one - it has readonly-mapper+queries but still becomes a secondary_table in the relations. svil --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
