On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Michael Bayer <[email protected]> wrote: > if you actually have foreign keys expressing multiple paths to the > same things then there would be a cycle. It's hard to tell from > your mappings, your tables don't seem to have cycles from a foreign > key perspective. Even if there are cycles due to relation(), SQLA can > handle all that as long as the cycles arent from a row to itself (and > even that it can handle via the post_update option). I see a lot
That's good to hear. > going on there, maybe inheritance and such ? (UserLang/Lang) I do not have inheritance at all, but I do have too many objects mapped (UserLang representing many-to-many table). Thanks for help and pointing me better direction. For now I solved my issues by doing partial flushes, and having some 'register_dependency' entries. You spent much time for me anyway - Thanks :) T. -- _i______'simplicity_is_the_key'__________tomasz_nazar _ii____'i_am_concern_oriented'________________JKM-UPR _iii__'patsystem.sf.net'___________________linux_user _'aspectized.com'___________________________prevayler --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
