When I eagerload an object's 3 nested collections, the SqlAlchemy debug output is about 30 lines long. When I don't eagerload, the debug output is about 10,700 lines long. So the eagerload is definitely using less queries.
However, the eagerload strategy takes many times longer than the lazyload. My client connection actually times out before the eagerload can return results, while lazyload takes about 17 seconds. In general, is this to be expected in certain cases, or should eagerload always be faster and I am just doing something wrong? Bryan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
