Michael Bayer wrote: [snip solution] >> Would this be a reasonable solution? > > it is.
Okay, good. > cascade_iterator() is on the right track too, the string argument > you'd send would be a "cascade" type, one of "save-update", "merge", > "delete", etc. "all" is one of the arguments for "cascade" its true but > internally that is expanded into the individual entries (see > CascadeOptions in sqlalchemy.orm.util). I couldn't get it to return anything though. What should the second argument to cascade_iterator be? The ORM-mapped object? (but I go no results even though I expected them) Or something else? Regards, Martijn --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
