> the solution is the same as that I illustrated in a previous email, that > when you map to a JOIN you must place all "equivalent" columns which you > would like populated identically in groups. This is described > athttp://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/05/mappers.html#mapping-a-class-agains...
You're right. Sorry, it just wasn't clear to me that you need to specify the equivalent columns throughout the whole inheritance hierarchy. I thoguht that SQLA would somehow automagically know that they are "equivalent". Thanks a lot for your effort Mike, this was really of great help! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
