Thanks for the fast reply. This is exciting. Both WITH and OVER are two things that I look forward to then.
On Jul 6, 4:31 pm, Michael Bayer <[email protected]> wrote: > this is the current status of that: > > http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy/browse_thread/thread/c20a4f... > > WITH and OVER seem to be the upcoming things we'll have to work on (PG, > MSSQL, DB2 support WITH). Oracle makes WITH difficult. Its also getting > to be time to do a DB2 dialect. > > On Jul 6, 2010, at 7:07 PM, Mike Lewis wrote: > > > > > Does SA support this syntax? > > >http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/queries-with.html > > > Thanks, > > Mike > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "sqlalchemy" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en.
