Thank you so much, Michael! It makes sense. I just tried it out, and it works correctly. I should have asked this question sooner. I would have saved myself a lot of wasted effort.
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Michael Bayer <[email protected]>wrote: > > On Nov 6, 2010, at 1:26 PM, lavoisier wrote: > > > > > imgtag_assoc = schema.Table('imgtag_assoc', schema.MetaData(), > > schema.Column('image_id', types.Integer, > > schema.ForeignKey('images.id')), > > schema.Column('tag_id', types.Integer, > > schema.ForeignKey('tags.id')) > > ) > > > > > > Does anyone have any thoughts on what I'm doing wrong? I looked at the > > SQLAlchemy website, and this is how they showed to implement a many-to- > > many using the declarative base. > > > > your association table is missing the usage of Base.metadata illustrated in > the declarative example at > http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/orm/relationships.html#many-to-many . > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sqlalchemy" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<sqlalchemy%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en. > > -- .-. /v\ L I N U X // \\ >Phear the Penguin< /( )\ ^^-^^ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en.
