> -----Original Message----- > From: sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com [mailto:sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com] > On Behalf Of Michael Bayer > Sent: 27 September 2011 16:24 > To: sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: [sqlalchemy] Possible bug with subqueryload > > Hi Simon - > > yeah that looks pretty buglike to me, mapper.order_by is not a > frequently used feature so this one may need some adjustment. > > I've created http://www.sqlalchemy.org/trac/ticket/2287 to take a > look at this and so far I'm targeting it at 0.6.9/0.7.3. >
Great, thanks a lot :-) I only discovered it in a toy application, and the workaround (including order_by on the query) is not a problem. In this toy application, I was also wondering if there existed a mechanism for doing some sort of "lazy subqueryload". ie. I'm loading a collection of objects and I don't know ahead of time if I'm going to access a particular relationship (so I don't want to eagerload it). However, if I *do* access it, I'm going to access it on each object in the collection, so I'd like to load all the related objects in a single hit. It's just like a subqueryload, except it is only executed when the relationship is accessed for the first time. Is that a silly idea? Or perhaps it already exists and I've missed it. Thanks, Simon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en.
