Thank you, that is exactly what I needed.

For the record, it also works with primaryjoin defined on the
ColumnProperties (Table2.code etc...) and with a column property.

> I'm not sure which side here you'd want to consider "foreign", that is, the 
> column which seeks to match an existing column.   Switching "foreign_keys" to 
> point to table1.c.code or table2.c.code will cause relationship to consider 
> it as many-to-one, or one-to-many, respectively.

If my relationship has no backref, and the viewonly flag is set to
false, what are the implications of switching foreign_keys ?

Regards,

--
Ronan Dunklau

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sqlalchemy" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en.

Reply via email to