also in 0.8 I'm definitely going to make it so that "primaryjoin" thing isn't needed for this kind of case, foreign_keys="foo.id" will be enough, see http://www.sqlalchemy.org/trac/ticket/2411 .
On Feb 18, 2012, at 7:30 AM, Jakob D. wrote: > Thanks Michael. As always I appreciate the support here. > > I'll try it out. It might actually be faster to redo these two tables in the > model in plain SQLAlchemy than trying to figure out what's wrong with the > current one. > > And, uhm, there is no difference between user_account and workers. I just > renamed a few fields so that it'd make more sense. But obviously I managed to > make it so that it made less sense. > > //JD > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sqlalchemy" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sqlalchemy/-/w3ngcBw7OjMJ. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en.
