This is just a datatype so follow the instructions at http://docs.sqlalchemy.org/en/rel_0_7/core/types.html#creating-new-types to implement your own version of this type. The trick of course is that the DBAPI supports it as well, i.e. pyodbc or pymssql. If not, you may have to petition those projects as well for support.
On Jun 5, 2012, at 5:33 PM, RainG wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed that currently > hierarchyid(http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb677290.aspx) of SQL > Server 2008 and up is not being supported. Although this type seems kind of > out of the place of the general framework of SQLAlchemy, it nevertheless > seems to be one potentially efficient way of representing hierarchical data > in SQL Server(and SQL Server only...). I am just wondering if there had been > discussions on the support of this type and if any conclusions had been made. > > Thank you for the great package, it'd been an awesome experience! > > Richard > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sqlalchemy" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sqlalchemy/-/bz5_5ItXsYgJ. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en.
