Thank you, and a big applaud to everybody for a fantastic new version.
On Wednesday, October 31, 2012 12:01:34 PM UTC-6, Michael Bayer wrote: > > thanks, this is a quick one where you can see the details at > http://www.sqlalchemy.org/trac/ticket/2597. Just need to write a couple > of tests and that will go right in. > > > On Oct 31, 2012, at 1:16 PM, Rich wrote: > > > I've attached a test script that illustrates a regression in the 0.8 > branch compared to the 0.7 branch. > > I know the example doesn't make a lot of sense in its current form as I've > had to chop out tons of code to make it minimalistic. It appears that the > problem deals with specifying a key on a table column under certain > conditions. Removing the params statement in the query resolves the > problem (I know that the params don't make sense in this query, they do in > my production code). Also taking the key='id' off of product_offering_id > and changing the query accordingly resolves the issue. > > So perhaps the params don't deal with column keys correctly? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sqlalchemy" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sqlalchemy/-/i1t3xnxH2wkJ. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]<javascript:> > . > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] <javascript:>. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en. > <test.py> > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sqlalchemy/-/wNcgsdKRM64J. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en.
