Hi Simon,

Ok cool. So, I updated that, but now I'm getting the following error:

sqlalchemy.exc.NoReferencedTableError: Foreign key associated with column
'phonenumbers.exchange_exchange' could not find table 'exchange' with which
to generate a foreign key to target column 'exchange'

It looks like SQLa is trying to create the tables out of order (I'm
guessing?). Is there a way to force this to execute in a specific order?

-Randall


On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Simon King <[email protected]> wrote:

> You have to put your ForeignKeyConstraint in the __table_args__ for the
> PhoneNumber class - see
> http://docs.sqlalchemy.org/en/rel_0_8/orm/extensions/declarative.html#table-configurationfor
>  details. Something like:
>
> class PhoneNumber(db.Model):
>     __tablename__ = 'phonenumbers'
>
>     phone_number = db.Column(db.Numeric(precision=4, scale=0),
>                              primary_key=True)
>     exchange_exchange = db.Column(db.Integer, primary_key=True)
>     exchange_area_code_pk = db.Column(db.Integer, primary_key=True)
>
>     __table_args__ = (db.ForeignKeyConstraint(
>                          ['exchange_exchange', 'exchange_area_code_pk'],
>                          ['exchange.exchange', 'exchange.area_code_pk'],
>                          ),
>                       )
>
> Simon
>
>
> On 7 Mar 2013, at 23:49, Randall Degges <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Lloyd,
> >
> > Thank you! I believe this is what I was trying to figure out, although I
> am having further issues now. Here's a recent pastie with my improved
> models, along with the errors I'm now having, http://pastie.org/6417080
> >
> > What I've done (as you can probably see) is I've used the
> ForeignKeyConstraint on my PhoneNumber table, to ensure that I'm able to
> link to my exchanges table properly. Unfortunately, this looks like it is
> not being picked up by SQLAlchemy, since it's complaining that I have no
> Foreign Keys for that table.
> >
> > Also, just for reference, I've totally wiped / recreated my DBs to test
> this, so I'm sure it isn't a result of migrations or anything like that.
> >
> > If I run \d phonenumbers inside of psql, I get the following output (
> http://pastie.org/6417088), thought that might also be of help.
> >
> > Thank you all for your help so far, I can't wait to get this working!
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > -Randall
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 5:41 AM, Lloyd Kvam <[email protected]> wrote:
> > While primary_key is specified twice, once for each column, there is
> only ONE primary key which is a composite.
> >
> > You need to use ForeignKeyConstraint at the Table level to specify a
> composite foreign key.
> >
> > You need to provide two lists, the local table columns, and the
> corresponding foreign table columns.
> > Now you know what to search for if  you need more information.
> >
> > from the schema definition language docs
> > It’s important to note that the ForeignKeyConstraint is the only way to
> define a composite foreign key. While we could also have placed individual
> ForeignKey objects on both theinvoice_item.invoice_id and
> invoice_item.ref_num columns, SQLAlchemy would not be aware that these two
> values should be paired together - it would be two individual foreign key
> constraints instead of a single composite foreign key referencing two
> columns.
> >
> >
> > On Wednesday, March 6, 2013 9:00:56 PM UTC-5, Randall Degges wrote:
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > Sorry about that, I actually had a typo there. I've got a correct code
> sample available here
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15260842/how-can-i-build-a-foreignkey-to-a-table-which-has-multiple-primary-keys(just
>  posted it).
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > -Randall
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Michael Bayer <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > a database table can only have one primary key (hence "primary"), but
> that key can contain more than one column (a "composite" primary key).
> >
> > the model you have here is a little unclear, did you mean for the
> primary key of Exchange to be "exchange" , and the primary key of
> PhoneNumber to be the composite of "exchange" and "phone number" ?   that
> would be my guess as to what you're looking for.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mar 6, 2013, at 6:05 PM, Randall Degges <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I'm having a lot of trouble figuring out how to properly build my
> ForeignKey column for a table I'm defining. I've outlined my models here:
> http://pastie.org/6407419# (and put a comment next to the problematic
> line in my PhoneNumber model).
> >>
> >> Here's what's happening:
> >>
> >> My Exchange table has two primary keys. This is required for my use
> case.
> >>
> >> The PhoneNumber table I'm trying to define needs a ForeignKey to the
> Exchange table, but since the Exchange table has two primary keys, I can't
> figure out how to make the relationship work.
> >>
> >> Any guidance would be appreciated. Thank you.
> >>
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "sqlalchemy" group.
> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to [email protected].
> >>
> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >>
> >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en.
> >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "sqlalchemy" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to [email protected].
> >
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >
> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en.
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Randall Degges
> > http://rdegges.com/
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sqlalchemy/L3Z8yDiFa7g/unsubscribe?hl=en
> .
> > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> [email protected].
> >
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en.
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Randall Degges
> > http://rdegges.com/
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "sqlalchemy" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to [email protected].
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en.
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
> >
> >
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sqlalchemy/L3Z8yDiFa7g/unsubscribe?hl=en
> .
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>


-- 
Randall Degges
*http://rdegges.com/*

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sqlalchemy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to