No worries. I wanted to avoid those two patterns. I had played around with them, and wasn't too excited by the SQL and the work I'd probably need to optimize the query plan. Was hoping someone may have figured out a simpler way to achieve the same effect.
It made more sense to just do a second query for now, then revisit this later. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
