On Thursday, February 5, 2015 at 8:51:36 PM UTC-5, Michael Bayer wrote:
> and then only in conjunction with columns that explicitly use SERIAL. Just a quick warning on this: SERIAL could also be BIGSERIAL. They're just INT/BIGINT fields with certain properties set and a declared relationship to a sequence. You could also have a column that almost functions like a SERIAL, but is just an INT that defaults to a given sequence's next value. I think the only difference between the two is that a sequence's ownership by a column means that it will be automatically destroyed if the column/table is. In addition to the alembic code, this topic has some good background on it: http://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/47098/how-do-i-determine-if-a-column-is-defined-as-a-serial-data-type-instead-of-an-in -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
