maybe you can run through all the mappings with a script and produce a
textfile indicating the settings for all the relationships. then you
can verify that the back_populates code change produces the same thing.
On 9/16/15 3:47 PM, Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
I'm about to migrate about 70 relationships from backref to
back_populates so the model reads cleaner/better documented..
Most are straightwordard, but a handful are more complex -- order_by
or uselist are on the backref, or there may be a handful of args or
primaryjoin on the relationship.
are there any gotchas I should look out for, or should I expect this
be straightforward?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "sqlalchemy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sqlalchemy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
