Dear Mr Bayer and SQLAlchemy users,

We have an issue which probably counts as a feature request rather than a bug, 
because it's sufficiently esoteric. We need to be able to use some Mappers (in 
one Metadata) while other mappers (in a different Metadata) are not and cannot 
be completely configured. This is because we fetch code (including Mapper 
source files) from the database using SQLAlchemy (with a different 
Metadata/declarative_base), and it's possible that we are in the middle of 
loading Mappers when we need to fetch another source file from the database to 
complete the configuration.

Here is an example that reproduces the problem that we see:

from sqlalchemy import Column, ForeignKey, Integer, Table, Text, create_engine, 
event
from sqlalchemy.ext.declarative import declarative_base, declared_attr
from sqlalchemy.orm import Mapper, configure_mappers, relationship, sessionmaker
from sqlalchemy.orm.mapper import _mapper_registry

_mapper_registry.clear()

FirstBase = declarative_base()
AnotherBase = declarative_base()

class Widget(FirstBase):
    __tablename__ = 'widget'
    id = Column(Integer, primary_key=True)
    name = Column(Text)

class Animal(AnotherBase):
    __tablename__ = 'mammal'

    id = Column(Integer, primary_key=True)
    name = Column(Text)
    species = Column(Text)

    @declared_attr
    def __mapper_args__(cls):
        return {
            'polymorphic_on':       cls.species,
           'polymorphic_identity': cls.__name__,
        }

# Register the first classes and create their Mappers:
configure_mappers()

# Simulate dynamic loading of an additional mapped class, which refers to one 
that has not been loaded yet:
class Mammal(Animal):
    # This mapping has an error, and therefore cannot be configured:
    employer = relationship("Employer")

# These new classes should not be configured at this point:
unconfigured = [m for m in _mapper_registry if not m.configured]
assert len(unconfigured) == 1, str(unconfigured)

# Now try to query Widget, which is registered in FirstBase, which is 
internally consistent:

engine = create_engine('sqlite://')
FirstBase.metadata.create_all(engine)

DBSession = sessionmaker(bind=engine)
session = DBSession(autocommit=True)

# We don't expect this query to fail because there is an error with a mapper in 
AnotherBase, but it does:
widgets = session.query(Widget).all()

assert len(widgets) == 0
print("done!")

Which fails with the following exception, when it tries to query Widget at the 
end:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File 
python36\lib\site-packages\sqlalchemy-1.2.7-py3.6-win-amd64.egg\sqlalchemy\ext\declarative\clsregistry.py,
  line 281, in __call__
    x = eval(self.arg, globals(), self._dict)
File "", line 1, in
NameError: name 'Employer' is not defined

During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File multiple_bases_polymorphic_mapper_configuration_repro.py,  line 62, in
    widgets = session.query(Widget).all()
  File 
python36\lib\site-packages\sqlalchemy-1.2.7-py3.6-win-amd64.egg\sqlalchemy\orm\session.py,
  line 1399, in query
    return self._query_cls(entities, self, **kwargs)
  File 
python36\lib\site-packages\sqlalchemy-1.2.7-py3.6-win-amd64.egg\sqlalchemy\orm\query.py,
  line 141, in __init__
    self._set_entities(entities)
  File 
python36\lib\site-packages\sqlalchemy-1.2.7-py3.6-win-amd64.egg\sqlalchemy\orm\query.py,
  line 152, in _set_entities
    self._set_entity_selectables(self._entities)
  File 
python36\lib\site-packages\sqlalchemy-1.2.7-py3.6-win-amd64.egg\sqlalchemy\orm\query.py,
  line 182, in _set_entity_selectables
    ent.setup_entity(*d[entity])
  File 
python36\lib\site-packages\sqlalchemy-1.2.7-py3.6-win-amd64.egg\sqlalchemy\orm\query.py,
  line 3668, in setup_entity
    self._with_polymorphic = ext_info.with_polymorphic_mappers
  File 
python36\lib\site-packages\sqlalchemy-1.2.7-py3.6-win-amd64.egg\sqlalchemy\util\langhelpers.py,
  line 767, in __get__
    obj.__dict__[self.__name__] = result = self.fget(obj)
  File 
python36\lib\site-packages\sqlalchemy-1.2.7-py3.6-win-amd64.egg\sqlalchemy\orm\mapper.py,
  line 2011, in _with_polymorphic_mappers
    configure_mappers()
  File 
python36\lib\site-packages\sqlalchemy-1.2.7-py3.6-win-amd64.egg\sqlalchemy\orm\mapper.py,
  line 3029, in configure_mappers
    mapper._post_configure_properties()
  File 
python36\lib\site-packages\sqlalchemy-1.2.7-py3.6-win-amd64.egg\sqlalchemy\orm\mapper.py,
  line 1828, in _post_configure_properties
    prop.init()
  File 
python36\lib\site-packages\sqlalchemy-1.2.7-py3.6-win-amd64.egg\sqlalchemy\orm\interfaces.py,
  line 184, in init
    self.do_init()
  File 
python36\lib\site-packages\sqlalchemy-1.2.7-py3.6-win-amd64.egg\sqlalchemy\orm\relationships.py,
  line 1655, in do_init
    self._process_dependent_arguments()
  File 
python36\lib\site-packages\sqlalchemy-1.2.7-py3.6-win-amd64.egg\sqlalchemy\orm\relationships.py,
  line 1712, in _process_dependent_arguments
    self.target = self.mapper.mapped_table
  File 
python36\lib\site-packages\sqlalchemy-1.2.7-py3.6-win-amd64.egg\sqlalchemy\util\langhelpers.py,
  line 767, in __get__
    obj.__dict__[self.__name__] = result = self.fget(obj)
  File 
python36\lib\site-packages\sqlalchemy-1.2.7-py3.6-win-amd64.egg\sqlalchemy\orm\relationships.py,
  line 1628, in mapper
    argument = self.argument()
  File 
python36\lib\site-packages\sqlalchemy-1.2.7-py3.6-win-amd64.egg\sqlalchemy\ext\declarative\clsregistry.py,
  line 293, in __call__
    (self.prop.parent, self.arg, n.args[0], self.cls)
sqlalchemy.exc.InvalidRequestError: When initializing mapper 
Mapper|Mammal|mammal, expression 'Employer' failed to locate a name ("name 
'Employer' is not defined"). If this is a class name, consider adding this 
relationship() to the <class '__main__.Mammal'> class after both dependent 
classes have been defined.

I think the problem is that Mapper._new_mappers is global, so we call 
configure_mappers() even though there are no new mappers for this 
declarative_base (FirstBase), so I don't think it should be necessary.

I imagine that the fix would be something like moving _new_mappers onto the 
Metadata itself, but I don't know how difficult it would be. Is this something 
that you would consider?

Alternatively, a simpler workaround for our case, where we do not need 
polymorphism on the Widget class, would be to short-circuit 
_with_polymorphic_mappers() in such cases, so that it doesn't need to call 
configure_mappers at all.

Thanks, Chris.



This email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please 
advise us immediately and delete this message. 
The registered name of Cantab- part of GAM Systematic is Cantab Capital 
Partners LLP. 
See - http://www.gam.com/en/Legal/Email+disclosures+EU for further information 
on confidentiality, the risks of non-secure electronic communication, and 
certain disclosures which we are required to make in accordance with applicable 
legislation and regulations. 
If you cannot access this link, please notify us by reply message and we will 
send the contents to you.

GAM Holding AG and its subsidiaries (Cantab – GAM Systematic) will collect and 
use information about you in the course of your interactions with us. 
Full details about the data types we collect and what we use this for and your 
related rights is set out in our online privacy policy at 
https://www.gam.com/en/legal/privacy-policy. 
Please familiarise yourself with this policy and check it from time to time for 
updates as it supplements this notice.

-- 
SQLAlchemy - 
The Python SQL Toolkit and Object Relational Mapper

http://www.sqlalchemy.org/

To post example code, please provide an MCVE: Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable 
Example.  See  http://stackoverflow.com/help/mcve for a full description.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sqlalchemy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to