>>     Other software architectures can support parallelisation better, can't 
>> they?
>
> Can you clarify what you hope to achieve when you continue to make statements
> of this form?  I don't find them to be very constructive.

I dared to point out that I stumbled on another software limitation.
Now I am also looking again for possible adjustments and extensions.


> There are many software architectures available for your use

I check a few of them once more.


> and you should choose the ones which work best for you.

I hope to achieve more helpful evolution for affected software areas.

Regards,
Markus

-- 
SQLAlchemy - 
The Python SQL Toolkit and Object Relational Mapper

http://www.sqlalchemy.org/

To post example code, please provide an MCVE: Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable 
Example.  See  http://stackoverflow.com/help/mcve for a full description.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sqlalchemy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to