On Sat, May 8, 2021, at 11:05 AM, Mike Bayer wrote: > >> ** >> I was wondering if: >> 1. There was a reason for this difference in behaviour? Should a checked-in >> connection show up as 'IDLE'? > > I would check your methodology of measurement because that's not the expected > result and it does not reproduce here.
to clarify, yes it *is* expected that checked in connections are IDLE in all cases. it is *not* expected that you are only getting one row back when you have a pool with two connections. -- SQLAlchemy - The Python SQL Toolkit and Object Relational Mapper http://www.sqlalchemy.org/ To post example code, please provide an MCVE: Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable Example. See http://stackoverflow.com/help/mcve for a full description. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sqlalchemy/7c029719-faeb-454c-8631-21a1b6b203e7%40www.fastmail.com.
