Gaetan de Menten wrote: > Well, do you have anything against the current way of doing (the > dual-purpose argument)? In any case, I've just documented the > current behavior.
Its a little unclear, but I can live with it. The biggest issue is that it was not documented. Thanks for taking care of this! -- Jonathan LaCour http://cleverdevil.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SQLElixir" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlelixir?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
