On Apr 3, 10:49 am, "Gaetan de Menten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Jason R. Coombs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I'd have left it in there if this was the case. But as far as I could > see, it was covered by the "test_multi" test. >
You're right. I didn't read your previous message thoroughly enough. > This is an option, but I'd prefer if this was implemented on SA's > side. It's the same problem and forcing the user to define a > child_fkey it doesn't care about is not optimal IMO. > I agree. Let's see what Michael says. Regards, Jason --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SQLElixir" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlelixir?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
