>>> could you release 0.7 please? >> >> Yes. I will. There is that little bug that I absolutely want to fix >> before releasing: http://elixir.ematia.de/trac/ticket/69. FWIW, this >> is what prevented me to release for several months (because the >> release is otherwise ready IMO). But see my other mail for details. >> > in fact, only the remote_colname is missing, isn't it? the second manytomany > may thus be deduced, and it should include the backref.
No. What you state is true for autoloaded ManyToMany, not "standard" ones. Making those parameters mandatory (and both would have to be mandatory as you cannot deduce one from the other in the "not-autoloaded" case) is similar to solution #3 proposed in my other mail. What you suggest could be an alternative as it is slightly less practical than solution #3 but nicer and more integrated with the rest. -- Gaëtan de Menten http://openhex.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SQLElixir" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlelixir?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
