rene wrote:
My questions are:
*is this a bug?
*why does indexing take that long?
*will it be fixed in 3.0?
*should i consider using embedded mysql instead (not tested that if it got better performance
though)?
*would it help if i create a seperate database for this particulair table? (there is about 30%
space used by other tables)
This is a performance issue that should be looked into.
You can help by providing us with the schema that you
are using and several dozen rows of sample data.
--
D. Richard Hipp -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- 704.948.4565
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
