Howdy,

On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 19:48:25 +0100 (BST), Christian Smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Sep 2004, Stefan Neumann wrote:
> >I think sqlite could be ideal for this purpose. Does anybody know
> >of any intentions to make something like an XPCOM-wrapper for
> >sqlite? Could this mean a lot of work and is there any project that
> >could serve as a starting-point?
> 
> My company did just this. We're using SQLite to manage installation
> information, and use Mozilla as a frontend. We wrote an XPCOM component
> against SQLite 2.8.x to provide access to the data in a uniform way across
> C++ and Javascript.
> 
> I can see if we're willing to release the code. No promises, mind. And I'm
> not even sure what we wrote would be a good template, as it provides just
> the limited functionality we required in house.

I'm starting to develop some core mozilla data storage bits, backed by
sqlite 3.. part of this is a "light" xpcom-y binding for sqlite, as
well as richer/easier to use interfaces for clients that don't want to
use SQL directly (RDF, for example).  This is not "near term" stuff
though, maybe a few months out for something usable; if you need just
simple access to a local database, you can probably do it through the
sql extension (that someone pointed out earlier), or just write a thin
binding to sqlite.

    - Vlad

Reply via email to