What if transactions only executed if they were able
to get an EXCLUSIVE lock? Wouldn't that solve the
problem you described? Granted, this would be
overkill for transactions that only did SELECTs,
but...
--- "b.bum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Not in a transaction.
>
> The purpose of a transaction is to group together a
> series of
> operations for both efficiency's sake and to ensure
> integrity.
>
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com
