On Apr 7, 2005 7:44 AM, Kervin L. Pierre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I know your pain :) . Finer grain locking would be > great.
Yes. We may simply be trying to use SQLite for something it just wasn't designed for. On the other hand, if you are using SQLite as your single-user database, it would be just so cool if you could "drop" those same databases on a server and turn them into multi-user databases. > The only problem I see is that you'd have to call > that trigger on every write. To at least check for > a lock. Would that be an acceptable performance > hit for you? Yes, performance is my big concern. But I'm wondering if triggers aren't fairly optimized. I guess I'm going to find out :) > Another solution, if it suits your environment would > be to create a 'record' object or struct and give > each object a mutex. That is also a very interesting idea. Thanks.
