On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 21:21 -0400, Paul G wrote: > i might put in some work on this, although it's a bit more work than i'd > hoped (shm would have been faster afair). will this patch, assuming it looks > decent and works (for a reasonable threshold of 'works'), be accepted into > trunk? it's a bit too much to do just for myself, but assuming others would > benefit as well, i might be up for it. >
Anything that increases the library footprint needs to be surrounded with #ifndef SQLITE_OMIT_.... There are a lot of embedded users who care a great deal about footprint. See also http://www.sqlite.org/copyright.html -- D. Richard Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
