I agree completely! I am grateful that SQLite exists. It would be good if users could post solutions, similar to forums. This relieves the burden on the benefactors ... and would, quite likely, attract more users.
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Warren Young <war...@etr-usa.com> wrote: > On Jan 27, 2017, at 1:09 PM, Clyde Eisenbeis <cte...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> The SQLite websites would be more useful with examples. > > Certainly. No question. > > The thing is, I think most of us are primarily grateful that SQLite *exists* > and that it works as well as it does. Given a choice of where our > benefactors choose to put their efforts, I think most people on this list > would prefer that it be put into SQLite itself, rather than the docs, which > are already uncommonly good. > > One of the great virtues of open source is that when some behavior is not > explicitly documented, you can dig in and find out why it behaves the way it > does. Closed-source products often have to have more extensive documentation > because that’s the only way you have to understand it, short of breaking out > the disassembler. > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org > http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
