On 3 Mar 2017, at 11:47pm, Scott Hess <sh...@google.com> wrote: > I'd say you should consider switching to some sort of queue feeding a > worker pool, then experimenting with pool sizes.
Agreed. Set up 5 threads which have actual access to the database. Have your 1835 jobs queue up their jobs for servicing by those 5 threads. Then mess with the '5' until you find a good value. Simon. _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
