On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Cezary H. Noweta <c...@poczta.onet.pl> wrote:
> Hello, > > > The standard says: ``Only UTF-16/32 (even not UTF-16/32LE/BE) encoding > forms can contain BOM''. Let's conform to this. > > I concur with that. Since UTF-8 is only bytes; what would a BOM even change? certainly longer values composed of multiple bytes(16,32 bit values) makes sense but not when everything is only a byte to begin with? It's not a BitOrderMark. > > Cezary H. Noweta > > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org > http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
