On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 08:26:51AM -0500, Charles Leifer wrote: > sqlite4's future is uncertain. It's not, as I understand, meant to replace > sqlite3 any time soon. I think it was more of a place to try out new ideas > for implementations.
I must say though, SQLite4 is *brilliant*. I do hope that it either gets completed and replaces SQLite3, or has all its good ideas folded into SQLite3. The LSM1 work in SQLite3 seems to point towords the latter. _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list email@example.com http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users