On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 08:26:51AM -0500, Charles Leifer wrote:
> sqlite4's future is uncertain. It's not, as I understand, meant to replace
> sqlite3 any time soon. I think it was more of a place to try out new ideas
> for implementations.

I must say though, SQLite4 is *brilliant*.  I do hope that it either
gets completed and replaces SQLite3, or has all its good ideas folded
into SQLite3.  The LSM1 work in SQLite3 seems to point towords the
sqlite-users mailing list

Reply via email to