Clifford Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 09:02:38AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > You are right: this is not a real memory leak. > > [..] > > in fact, for a program which is eg. continously using mktemp() (or a > simmilar but not unsecure api) for creating temporary databases it is a > real memory leak, because the hash table will grow one entry for every > temporary database created. >
I added a new regression test named manydb.test to prove that the above is not a problem. I also added code to deallocate the hash tables when their size reaches zero. This is pointless code that is there only to make valgrind happy. But I get complaints about valgrind frequently enough that I've grown weary of reading them. So now SQLite is a little bigger and a little slower, but at least valgrind doesn't complain anymore. -- D. Richard Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
