I haven't grasped all the fancy memory talk that's been going on here, but I have one request. Would you try the slowdown tests with a SQLite version compiled with... SQLITE_DEFAULT_MMAP_SIZE=0 SQLITE_MAX_MMAP_SIZE=0 ...and see if anything changes? I started compiling with those options after some similar speed issues "back when" and things seem to have cleared up since then. I'm curious if it's because I added that or if it's just a coincidence. _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list [email protected] http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
- Re: [sqlite] .timer Keith Medcalf
- Re: [sqlite] .timer Keith Medcalf
- Re: [sqlite] .timer Keith Medcalf
- Re: [sqlite] .timer Keith Medcalf
- Re: [sqlite] .timer Keith Medcalf
- Re: [sqlite] .timer x
- Re: [sqlite] .timer Keith Medcalf
- Re: [sqlite] .timer x
- Re: [sqlite] .timer Keith Medcalf
- Re: [sqlite] .timer x
- Re: [sqlite] .timer David Raymond
- Re: [sqlite] .timer Keith Medcalf
- Re: [sqlite] .timer Keith Medcalf
- Re: [sqlite] .timer curmudgeon
- Re: [sqlite] .timer Keith Medcalf
- Re: [sqlite] .timer x
- Re: [sqlite] .timer x
- Re: [sqlite] .timer Simon Slavin
- Re: [sqlite] .timer x
- Re: [sqlite] .timer Keith Medcalf
- Re: [sqlite] .timer x

