On 8/25/18, Ralf Junker <ralfjun...@gmx.de> wrote: > I am aware that the use of SQLITE_UNTESTABLE is discouraged. Still I > want to point developers to the fact that SQLITE_UNTESTABLE breaks RBU.
Thank you, Ralf. We are well aware of this. There are lots of similar situations, where omitting features from SQLite will break extensions that depend on those features. For example SQLITE_OMIT_VIRTUALTABLE will break FTS3, FTS4, FTS5, and RTREE, all of which depend on virtual tables. We are curious to know, though, what you are doing with RBU? That's a obscure and special purpose extension that we did for a single client. Are you finding it useful for something? -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
